ELT365 · Day 264 — Lesson Plans for One-to-One Teaching
One-to-one lessons strip away the safety net of pair and group work. Every interaction sits directly between teacher and learner — making planning for variety and pacing essential.
Every lesson, essay and journal entry, newest first. 726 published posts.
One-to-one lessons strip away the safety net of pair and group work. Every interaction sits directly between teacher and learner — making planning for variety and pacing essential.
A personal aim is one teaching skill you are working on in a particular lesson. It makes observation feedback targeted rather than general.
A board plan shows what will be on the board at each key stage. Deciding it before the lesson prevents mid-lesson thinking about layout and ensures clarity.
List every material in your lesson plan: the coursebook page, the handout, the board diagram, the audio file. Prepare, check, and sequence everything before the lesson.
Interaction patterns describe who talks to whom: T→S (teacher to student), S→S (pair), S↔S↔S (group), S→T (student reporting). Vary them across a lesson.
Planned timings are starting estimates. Under-timing is a common error — novice teachers often plan more content than a lesson can hold.
Engage → Study → Activate (Harmer) is a flexible framework where the three phases can appear in any order. It suits varied lesson types and mixed aims.
Task-Based Learning plans lead with a communicative task; language work comes after. The task creates a felt need for the language.
Test → Teach → Test plans diagnose what learners already know before committing teaching time. The first 'test' is a diagnostic task, not an assessment.
A PPP plan moves through Presentation (teacher introduces language in context), Practice (controlled activities), and Production (freer use). It is transparent and suits lower levels.
Each stage has its own micro-aim that serves the overall lesson aim. The lead-in does not practise the target language — it activates interest and prior knowledge.
A stage is a discrete part of the lesson with its own aim, activity, interaction pattern, and timing. Most 60-minute lessons have four to seven stages.
For every anticipated problem, write a solution — not a worry. The plan is your back-up strategy. A problem without a solution is just an anxiety on paper.
Beyond language, plan for procedural problems: unclear task design, grouping that doesn't work, or a text too long for the time available.
Before teaching, predict where learners will struggle with the target language: meaning confusion, form errors, or pronunciation difficulty.
Lesson plans should state what learners are expected to already know. This shapes your starting point and helps you avoid teaching what they already have.
Target language is the specific item you are teaching: a structure, a set of lexical chunks, a functional exponent. Analyse it before you plan any stages.
A good lesson aim is learner-facing and observable: 'By the end, learners will be better able to…' Avoid teacher behaviour ('I will teach…') as the aim.
Every lesson needs one main aim — the primary thing learners will be better able to do by the end. Subsidiary aims are language or skills practised along the way.
A written plan is a hypothesis; the lesson is the experiment. Experienced teachers deviate from plans when learners need something different — but only because they planned well.
Questions about a post, a lesson or a video? Write to me.
sourovdeb.is [at] gmail [dot] com
Sourov Deb EI · SIRET 106 764 061 00011 · Saint-Pierre, La Réunion