ELT365 · Day 205 — Peer feedback: setting it up so it works
Idea — Peer feedback fails when learners just say ‘it is good.’ It works when they have a specific criterion: ‘Does the first sentence tell you…
ReadIdea — Peer feedback fails when learners just say ‘it is good.’ It works when they have a specific criterion: ‘Does the first sentence tell you…
ReadIdea — Marking every error overwhelms learners and teaches them to feel bad, not to improve. Choose one or two patterns — ideally the ones that…
ReadIdea — Learners often over-rely on connectors while ignoring other cohesive devices: pronoun reference, lexical chains, and ellipsis. Connectors alone make writing mechanical. Example — Weak:…
ReadIdea — A functional paragraph has three parts: a topic sentence that states the main idea, supporting sentences that develop it with examples or reasons, and…
ReadIdea — Planning forces learners to separate content decisions from language decisions. Without it, writers spend working memory on both at once and produce thin, underdeveloped…
ReadIdea — When analysing a model text, look at the form first — what the text does in each section — before asking learners what they…
ReadIdea — A model text shows learners what a good version of the target text looks like before they write their own. It sets the standard…
ReadIdea — Process writing focuses on how a text is built — planning, drafting, revising. It mirrors how real writers work and raises awareness of writing…
ReadPublished: 25 June 2026 · By Sourov Deb For the past few weeks, I’ve been building a system to automatically find English teaching and training opportunities…
ReadIdea — Classroom writing is not homework. In-class writing allows the teacher to monitor process, give real-time feedback, and use errors as teaching material. Example —…
ReadMost of this site is reading. These two are writing — the only way to find out what your English actually does, and what your inner weather is actually like. Take one now, or skip and find them in the menu at any time.
A twenty-question encounter with how you actually think in English.
This is not a multiple-choice test. There are no gap-fills and no word banks. Those instruments measure recognition. This one measures production — the unruly, idiosyncratic act of putting thought into English under gentle pressure.
You will be asked about your dreams, your reading, your silences, your weather. Some prompts feel like journal entries. Some feel like riddles. Answer them as yourself — only as yourself.
Thirteen sideways questions about the architecture of your own experience.
“How are you?” produces “fine.” “What is wrong?” produces defence. So this asks neither. It asks about texture, temperature, containers, landscapes at 3 AM — sideways entry points that let you describe an inner state without having to expose a biography.
There is no timer and no right answer. The only thing measured is granularity: how finely you can name what is happening inside you. That skill is learnable, and it travels with you.