ELT365 · Day 191 — Delayed error correction — the board trick
Idea — Write anonymised errors on the board during a fluency task. After the task, learners correct them together. Class-built correction; no individual embarrassment. Example —…
ReadIdea — Write anonymised errors on the board during a fluency task. After the task, learners correct them together. Class-built correction; no individual embarrassment. Example —…
ReadIdea — Give content feedback first — validate the communicative act — before correcting language. This tells learners the message matters, not only the form. Example…
ReadIdea — While learners do a speaking task, the teacher’s job is to listen, note language, and not interrupt — unless a learner is completely stuck.…
ReadIdea — In open discussion, confident speakers dominate and quieter learners produce nothing. Structured turns, written preparation, and talking tokens level the participation. Example — “Discuss”…
ReadIdea — Role play fails when learners do not understand the situation, lack the language for it, or care too much about accuracy to speak at…
ReadIdea — An information gap is the simplest communicative speaking task: student A holds information that B needs, and vice versa. Speaking happens because it must.…
ReadIdea — Controlled practice constrains form (fill the gap, substitute one word). Free practice gives full communicative choice. Jumping straight from a drill to a role…
ReadIdea — Drilling fixes the sound and rhythm of new language in muscle memory. Use it after presentation, before freer practice — never as a lesson…
ReadIdea — Accuracy activities focus on correct form; fluency activities build speed and confidence. Every speaking task sits on a spectrum. Name your aim before you…
ReadIdea — Learners talk all day. Speaking tasks give them specific language to practise in a communicative context. A task without a communicative goal is a…
ReadMost of this site is reading. These two are writing — the only way to find out what your English actually does, and what your inner weather is actually like. Take one now, or skip and find them in the menu at any time.
A twenty-question encounter with how you actually think in English.
This is not a multiple-choice test. There are no gap-fills and no word banks. Those instruments measure recognition. This one measures production — the unruly, idiosyncratic act of putting thought into English under gentle pressure.
You will be asked about your dreams, your reading, your silences, your weather. Some prompts feel like journal entries. Some feel like riddles. Answer them as yourself — only as yourself.
Thirteen sideways questions about the architecture of your own experience.
“How are you?” produces “fine.” “What is wrong?” produces defence. So this asks neither. It asks about texture, temperature, containers, landscapes at 3 AM — sideways entry points that let you describe an inner state without having to expose a biography.
There is no timer and no right answer. The only thing measured is granularity: how finely you can name what is happening inside you. That skill is learnable, and it travels with you.