function checkA(el,c,exp,q){
document.querySelectorAll(‘input[name=”q’+q+'”]’).forEach(function(r){r.disabled=true;});
var fb=document.getElementById(‘fb’+q);fb.style.display=’block’;
if(parseInt(el.value)===c){fb.style.background=’#c6f6d5′;fb.style.color=’#276749′;fb.innerHTML=’✓ Correct! ‘+exp;}
else{fb.style.background=’#fed7d7′;fb.style.color=’#9b2c2c’;fb.innerHTML=’✗ ‘+exp;}
}
function checkF(id,ans){
var v=document.getElementById(‘fi’+id).value.trim().toLowerCase();
var fb=document.getElementById(‘ff’+id);fb.style.display=’block’;
if(v===ans.toLowerCase()||v.replace(/s+/g,’ ‘)===ans.toLowerCase()){
fb.style.background=’#c6f6d5′;fb.style.color=’#276749’;fb.innerHTML=’✓ Correct: ‘+ans+’‘;}
else{fb.style.background=’#fed7d7′;fb.style.color=’#9b2c2c’;fb.innerHTML=’✗ Answer: ‘+ans+’‘;}
}
B2 ⏱ 5 min
👨🏫 What is a CCQ? — Teacher Training Micro-Lesson
I was corrected sharply during a teaching practice for asking ‘Do you understand?’ Here’s the better question — and why it matters.
📖 CCQ — Concept Checking Question
A CCQ (Concept Checking Question) checks that learners understand the MEANING of new language — not just whether they think they do.
Why ‘Do you understand?’ fails:
✗ Learners say ‘yes’ to avoid embarrassment.
✗ It checks confidence, not comprehension.
A good CCQ:
✓ Has a clear, checkable answer
✓ Requires use of the target concept (not just repetition)
✓ Uses simpler language than the target item
✓ Can’t be answered by ‘yes/no’ alone (usually)
📝 Example: Teaching ‘I used to smoke’
Target: I used to smoke. (past habit, no longer true)
Bad checking: ‘Do you understand used to?’
Good CCQs:
✓ ‘Do I smoke now?’ (No.)
✓ ‘Did I smoke in the past?’ (Yes.)
✓ ‘Is it a single action or a repeated habit?’ (Habit.)
The main purpose of a CCQ is to:
Which is an effective CCQ for ‘I’m exhausted’?
‘Do you understand?’ is problematic because:
CCQ stands for Concept ____________ Question.
A CCQ should use ____________ language than the target item itself.
✏️ Write 2 CCQs
(Hint: What tense? Which action happened first? Is she still there?)
Independent project; not affiliated with, endorsed by, or accredited by Cambridge University Press & Assessment. Confers no qualification.