ELT365 · Day 203 — Teacher written feedback — minimal marking
Idea — Minimal marking uses codes in the margin (sp = spelling, gr = grammar, ww = wrong word) rather than rewriting learners’ sentences. It requires…
ReadIdea — Minimal marking uses codes in the margin (sp = spelling, gr = grammar, ww = wrong word) rather than rewriting learners’ sentences. It requires…
ReadIdea — Peer editing asks learners to review each other’s drafts before a final version. It develops critical reading, reduces teacher correction load, and gives writers…
ReadIdea — Linking words (however, therefore, in addition) signal logical relationships between ideas. Discourse markers (right, anyway, so) organise speech. Both are often memorised incorrectly —…
ReadIdea — Cohesion is the surface-level linking of sentences (pronouns, connectors, lexical chains). Coherence is the underlying logical flow of ideas. Both are needed; you can…
ReadIdea — A paragraph in academic or formal writing typically opens with a topic sentence (the main idea), followed by supporting sentences (evidence, example, detail). Teaching…
ReadIdea — Every real piece of writing has a writer, a reader, a purpose, and a context. Classroom writing tasks that specify all four produce more…
ReadIdea — Free writing gives learners a topic and minimal constraints. It is the writing equivalent of a fluency task: quantity over accuracy, ideas over form.…
ReadIdea — Guided writing sits between controlled and free. Sentence frames, partial texts, and model analysis give learners structural support while allowing some choice of content.…
ReadIdea — Controlled writing tasks limit what learners can write: copy a model, complete gaps in a text, unscramble sentences. They build accuracy and familiarity with…
ReadIdea — Process writing treats the written text as the result of stages: brainstorm → plan → draft → revise → edit. Focusing only on the…
ReadMost of this site is reading. These two are writing — the only way to find out what your English actually does, and what your inner weather is actually like. Take one now, or skip and find them in the menu at any time.
A twenty-question encounter with how you actually think in English.
This is not a multiple-choice test. There are no gap-fills and no word banks. Those instruments measure recognition. This one measures production — the unruly, idiosyncratic act of putting thought into English under gentle pressure.
You will be asked about your dreams, your reading, your silences, your weather. Some prompts feel like journal entries. Some feel like riddles. Answer them as yourself — only as yourself.
Thirteen sideways questions about the architecture of your own experience.
“How are you?” produces “fine.” “What is wrong?” produces defence. So this asks neither. It asks about texture, temperature, containers, landscapes at 3 AM — sideways entry points that let you describe an inner state without having to expose a biography.
There is no timer and no right answer. The only thing measured is granularity: how finely you can name what is happening inside you. That skill is learnable, and it travels with you.