ELT365 · Day 198 — Planning a Piece of Writing
Idea — Planning before writing improves coherence and reduces mid-draft paralysis. Teaching learners to plan is itself a productive-skill lesson. Example — A mind map, a…
ReadIdea — Planning before writing improves coherence and reduces mid-draft paralysis. Teaching learners to plan is itself a productive-skill lesson. Example — A mind map, a…
ReadIdea — Process writing treats writing as a cycle: plan, draft, revise, edit. The product is secondary to the thinking behind it. Example — Learners brainstorm,…
ReadIdea — Images, diagrams, or key words shown before a listening task activate prior knowledge and reduce cognitive load during the listening itself. Example — A…
ReadIdea — Good multiple-choice distractors come from genuine misreadings, not random wrong answers. Each distractor should plausibly mislead a weak reader. Example — If the answer…
ReadIdea — A good detail question targets specific, locatable information. The wrong answers must be plausible, not absurd. Example — ‘How many students passed the test?’…
ReadIdea — A strong gist question has one correct answer that requires the whole text — not a detail pulled from the first line. Example —…
ReadA professional report follows a fixed structure regardless of topic: summary → background → findings → recommendations → conclusion. Examples Executive summary (one page, written last)…
ReadIdea — Video adds visual clues — gesture, facial expression, setting — that support comprehension. It’s not always easier: visual distractors can compete with listening. Example…
ReadIdea Mixed-ability planning means building in choice: an extension task for faster finishers, a support scaffold for those who need it. One plan, two pathways. Example…
ReadIdea — Reading rarely happens in isolation outside the classroom. Integrating it with speaking, writing, or listening creates richer, more authentic tasks. Example — Students read…
ReadMost of this site is reading. These two are writing — the only way to find out what your English actually does, and what your inner weather is actually like. Take one now, or skip and find them in the menu at any time.
A twenty-question encounter with how you actually think in English.
This is not a multiple-choice test. There are no gap-fills and no word banks. Those instruments measure recognition. This one measures production — the unruly, idiosyncratic act of putting thought into English under gentle pressure.
You will be asked about your dreams, your reading, your silences, your weather. Some prompts feel like journal entries. Some feel like riddles. Answer them as yourself — only as yourself.
Thirteen sideways questions about the architecture of your own experience.
“How are you?” produces “fine.” “What is wrong?” produces defence. So this asks neither. It asks about texture, temperature, containers, landscapes at 3 AM — sideways entry points that let you describe an inner state without having to expose a biography.
There is no timer and no right answer. The only thing measured is granularity: how finely you can name what is happening inside you. That skill is learnable, and it travels with you.