ELT365 · Day 195 — Controlled writing — copying and gap-fill
Idea — Controlled writing tasks limit what learners can write: copy a model, complete gaps in a text, unscramble sentences. They build accuracy and familiarity with…
ReadIdea — Controlled writing tasks limit what learners can write: copy a model, complete gaps in a text, unscramble sentences. They build accuracy and familiarity with…
ReadIdea — Process writing treats the written text as the result of stages: brainstorm → plan → draft → revise → edit. Focusing only on the…
ReadIdea — Elicitation is prompting a learner to produce the correct form themselves rather than supplying it. A raised eyebrow, a repeated word with rising intonation,…
ReadIdea — Reformulation means you restate what a learner said — correctly — without explicitly flagging the error. It is low-threat. Research suggests learners who notice…
ReadIdea — Correct mid-fluency task: you interrupt flow and discourage risk-taking. Correct after the task: you address language without breaking communication. Immediate correction suits accuracy stages;…
ReadIdea — While learners speak, circulate quietly — close enough to hear, far enough not to interrupt. Note good language and errors for feedback. Don’t hover…
ReadIdea — Discussions are less structured than debates but need the same scaffolding: a clear topic, opinion vocabulary pre-taught, and a task that requires interaction —…
ReadIdea — An information gap exists when two learners have different pieces of information and must communicate to complete a task. It creates genuine communicative purpose…
ReadIdea — A role play gives learners a situation, a role, and a communicative aim. Setting it up takes longer than running it. Clear instructions (who,…
ReadIdea — Pairwork and groupwork multiply speaking time. In a class of 20, teacher-led speaking means each learner speaks for under two minutes per hour. In…
ReadMost of this site is reading. These two are writing — the only way to find out what your English actually does, and what your inner weather is actually like. Take one now, or skip and find them in the menu at any time.
A twenty-question encounter with how you actually think in English.
This is not a multiple-choice test. There are no gap-fills and no word banks. Those instruments measure recognition. This one measures production — the unruly, idiosyncratic act of putting thought into English under gentle pressure.
You will be asked about your dreams, your reading, your silences, your weather. Some prompts feel like journal entries. Some feel like riddles. Answer them as yourself — only as yourself.
Thirteen sideways questions about the architecture of your own experience.
“How are you?” produces “fine.” “What is wrong?” produces defence. So this asks neither. It asks about texture, temperature, containers, landscapes at 3 AM — sideways entry points that let you describe an inner state without having to expose a biography.
There is no timer and no right answer. The only thing measured is granularity: how finely you can name what is happening inside you. That skill is learnable, and it travels with you.