ELT365 · Day 194 — Genre in writing — text types matter
Idea — Each text type has a predictable structure, register, and social purpose. Teaching the genre explicitly gives learners the skeleton before they fill it with…
ReadIdea — Each text type has a predictable structure, register, and social purpose. Teaching the genre explicitly gives learners the skeleton before they fill it with…
ReadIdea — Four stages, four cognitive tasks. Planning builds ideas; drafting releases them; revision improves content and structure; editing fixes surface form. Never mix revision and…
ReadIdea — Product writing aims at a finished text. Process writing stages the journey: brainstorm → draft → peer review → revise → final. Process builds…
ReadIdea — Write anonymised errors on the board during a fluency task. After the task, learners correct them together. Class-built correction; no individual embarrassment. Example —…
ReadIdea — Give content feedback first — validate the communicative act — before correcting language. This tells learners the message matters, not only the form. Example…
ReadIdea — While learners do a speaking task, the teacher’s job is to listen, note language, and not interrupt — unless a learner is completely stuck.…
ReadIdea — In open discussion, confident speakers dominate and quieter learners produce nothing. Structured turns, written preparation, and talking tokens level the participation. Example — “Discuss”…
ReadIdea — Role play fails when learners do not understand the situation, lack the language for it, or care too much about accuracy to speak at…
ReadIdea — An information gap is the simplest communicative speaking task: student A holds information that B needs, and vice versa. Speaking happens because it must.…
ReadIdea — Controlled practice constrains form (fill the gap, substitute one word). Free practice gives full communicative choice. Jumping straight from a drill to a role…
ReadMost of this site is reading. These two are writing — the only way to find out what your English actually does, and what your inner weather is actually like. Take one now, or skip and find them in the menu at any time.
A twenty-question encounter with how you actually think in English.
This is not a multiple-choice test. There are no gap-fills and no word banks. Those instruments measure recognition. This one measures production — the unruly, idiosyncratic act of putting thought into English under gentle pressure.
You will be asked about your dreams, your reading, your silences, your weather. Some prompts feel like journal entries. Some feel like riddles. Answer them as yourself — only as yourself.
Thirteen sideways questions about the architecture of your own experience.
“How are you?” produces “fine.” “What is wrong?” produces defence. So this asks neither. It asks about texture, temperature, containers, landscapes at 3 AM — sideways entry points that let you describe an inner state without having to expose a biography.
There is no timer and no right answer. The only thing measured is granularity: how finely you can name what is happening inside you. That skill is learnable, and it travels with you.